Williams C. The sandwich generation. Burke, MA. An aging society, Another viewpoint: Dependency ratios. Please contact us and let us know how we can help you. Dependency ratio View the most recent version. Archived Content Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. They have climbed to about 77 years today, and continue to improve. Meanwhile, life expectancy in less developed countries has gradually climbed, rising to about 65 years today.
Initial declines in mortality can be attributed to improvements in public health and living standards that accompanied the Industrial Revolution. Greater declines in the early 20th century were attributable to improvements in medical technology, which led to the control of such infectious diseases as smallpox and cholera.
Further improvements in life expectancy are anticipated in most countries. In countries where death from infectious diseases is minimal, the improvements will come from the decline in mortality from degenerative diseases such as heart disease and cancer. However, in some countries, the spread of AIDS and other infectious ailments is a potential threat to further gains in life expectancy. In parts of Africa, where the spread of HIV infection is disproportionately high, life expectancy has been declining.
It shows the major causes of death for the United States in and , and for Peru in Each column accounts for all causes of death with the top causes specified. Some causes are combined because of their similarities. Data on cause of death should be interpreted cautiously because some causes are more easily identified than others and are reported more completely. In the United States in , pneumonia and influenza, tuberculosis, and diarrhea accounted for almost one-third of all deaths.
Since then, mortality rates from these diseases have declined sharply. For example, pneumonia and influenza, which accounted for 12 percent of deaths in in the United States, accounted for 3percent in Heart disease and cancer, which account for half of all deaths today, caused only about 12 percent of deaths in In Peru today, the causes of death are broadly dispersed. About half are attributable to the top four causes: cancer, respiratory infections, heart disease, and accidents.
As Peru and other countries continue to develop, their causes of death may more closely resemble those of the United States today. As life expectancy improves and the role of infectious, parasitic, and respiratory infections further diminishes, more people will survive to older ages and chronic degenerative diseases such as stroke, cancer, and heart disease will make up a larger proportion of deaths.
In less developed countries, the chances of dying are greatest at infancy and remain high during the first few years of childhood. A newborn child is fragile and has not developed immunities to common ailments. When a country has a high rate of infant death, it usually signals high mortality risk from infectious, parasitic, communicable, and other diseases associated with poor sanitary conditions and undernutrition.
Worldwide, over 10 million children die annually before their fifth birthday. Neonatal causes include deaths from tetanus, severe infections, and premature births. Following neonatal causes, two of the primary causes of infant and child deaths are acute respiratory infections such as pneumonia and diarrhea. Other infectious diseases, such as malaria and measles, are also major causes of deaths to infants and children. Death from these conditions is almost unheard of for infants in more developed countries.
However, in less developed countries where undernutrition is prevalent, medical facilities are scarce, and living areas may be unsanitary, infant deaths are common. In , world IMRs ranged from 2. Many countries have even lower rates, with Iceland, Singapore, Japan, and Sweden heading the list. How has the proportion of Asian immigrants changed during the 20th century?
The proportion of Latin Americans? World population grows as a result of births and declines as a result of deaths. Net migration is the difference between the number of people entering a geographic area immigrants and those leaving emigrants. Over time, migration contributes more than just the initial number of people moving into an area, because the children and grandchildren born to the immigrant population add several times the original number to the population base.
There is also an increase in the number of deaths as a result of in-migration. Most Americans are immigrants or descendants of immigrants who arrived here over the past years. Only a small fraction of the population is related to the American Indians who were here when the first European settlers arrived in the s. Australia and Brazil are other countries whose current populations consist primarily of descendants of persons who immigrated there during the past two centuries.
In absolute numbers, international migration is at an all-time high. About million people lived outside their native countries in the mids, and that number increased to roughly million in The Middle East draws migrants from Africa and Asia and hosts millions of refugees from within the region. There is considerable migration within Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Most people move for economic reasons, but some migrate to escape political or religious persecution or simply to fulfill a personal dream.
Some experts divide the many reasons people leave their homes for a new one into push and pull factors. Push factors might be widespread unemployment, lack of farmland, famine, or war at home. The Great Depression — is a good example of a push factor, as hard times encouraged more residents to leave the United States than move in.
In the s and s, hundreds of thousands of Africans were pushed out of their homelands to neighboring countries because of famine and civil war. Factors that attract migrants are called pull factors. These include a booming economy, favorable immigration laws, or free agricultural land in the area to which the migrant is moving. For example, the labor shortage in Japan is pulling record numbers of legal and illegal immigrants to fill the low-status, low-paying, or dangerous jobs that Japanese natives reject.
In order to keep a working population that can support its elderly, Japan would need 17 million new immigrants by , according to a recent United Nations report. Other estimates have said Japan would need , new immigrants each year; however the idea of increased immigration is not favorable to most Japanese. The majority of migrants to the United States in the past years were European. By mid-century, just half of the migrants were from Europe.
The total number of immigrants fell to around 1 million in the s. In the s the number of migrants increased to levels similar to those at the turn of the century. But 84 percent of these migrants were from Latin America and Asia, and just 10 percent were from Europe.
The volume of legal immigration and the prevalence of migrants from Asia and Latin America will continue in the new century. The origins of immigrants change over time, as do their numbers and the effect that they have on U. According to one estimate, about 42 percent of the U. Immigration was an even greater factor in growth between and , when 20 million people entered the country. Natural increase added an average of 1 percent of the population increase per year during that period.
At that rate the population would have doubled in about 70 years, but it took only 50 years to double. Many immigrants have children once they arrive in the United States, creating further momentum for population growth.
Currently, fertility rates of immigrants are higher than those of the U. The volume of legal migration has fluctuated since the s.
Immigration has accounted for an increasing portion of population growth as American women began having fewer children. If current patterns continue, the population of the United States could rise to million in , from million in According to a recent report by the Pew Research Center, 82 percent of U. Of the three components of population change, migration is the most difficult component to predict and is most affected by government policies.
Because nations can control their borders, they may regulate the flow of legal immigrants. The oil-producing countries in the Middle East offered financial incentives to attract immigrants, just as the United States and Australia once offered free land. In , Japan permitted employment rights and residence for ethnic Japanese from Latin America.
An estimated 12 million were unauthorized. A migration theory that suggests that circumstances at the place of origin such as poverty and unemployment repel or push people out of that place to other places that exert a positive attraction or pull such as a high standard of living or job opportunities. How does this compare to population growth in more developed countries? For the last 50 years, world population multiplied more rapidly than ever before, and more rapidly than it is projected to grow in the future.
In , the world had 2. Anthropologists believe the human species dates back at least 3 million years. For most of our history, these distant ancestors lived a precarious existence as hunters and gatherers. This way of life kept their total numbers small, probably less than 10 million. However, as agriculture was introduced, communities evolved that could support more people.
World population expanded to about million by A. But after the start of the Industrial Revolution in the 18th century, living standards rose and widespread famines and epidemics diminished in some regions.
Population growth accelerated. The population climbed to about million in and reached 1 billion around Since rates of population growth are currently highest in the less developed regions , their share of world population will increase. Over time, the distribution of population changes because of variations in the rate of natural increase and net migration. In the United States between 60 percent and 70 percent of annual population growth is from natural increase and the rest is driven by international migration.
Rural-to-urban migration, combined with natural increase, is leading to a disproportionate increase in urban population, especially in less developed countries. By , the urban share had risen to 29 percent, and today it is 49 percent. Urban areas are getting larger. In , only the Tokyo and New York urban areas had over 10 million people. By , there could be more than 25 urban areas with over 10 million people. Eight of these urban areas would hold over 20 million people each.
Percentage of the total population living in areas termed urban by that country. Typically, the population living in towns of 2, or more or in national and provincial capitals is classified as urban. Some of this growth spilled over to the Americas, increasing their share of the world total. World population growth accelerated after World War II, when the population of less developed countries began to increase dramatically.
After millions of years of extremely slow growth, the human population indeed grew explosively, doubling again and again; a billion people were added between and ; another billion were added between and Throughout the 20th century each additional billion has been achieved in a shorter period of time.
Human population entered the 20th century with 1. The growth of the last years appears explosive on the historical timeline. The overall effects of this growth on living standards, resource use, and the environment will continue to change the world landscape long after. As long ago as , Thomas Malthus studied the nature of population growth in Europe. He claimed that population was increasing faster than food production, and he feared eventual global starvation. Of course he could not foresee how modern technology would expand food production, but his observations about how populations increase were important.
Population grows geometrically 1, 2, 4, 8 … , rather than arithmetically 1, 2, 3, 4 … , which is why the numbers can increase so quickly. A story said to have originated in Persia offers a classic example of exponential growth. It tells of a clever courtier who presented a beautiful chess set to his king and in return asked only that the king give him one grain of rice for the first square, two grains, or double the amount, for the second square, four grains or double again for the third, and so forth.
The king, not being mathematically inclined, agreed and ordered the rice to be brought from storage. The eighth square required grains, the 12th took more than one pound. Long before reaching the 64th square, every grain of rice in the kingdom had been used. Even today, the total world rice production would not be enough to meet the amount required for the final square of the chessboard.
The secret to understanding the arithmetic is that the rate of growth doubling for each square applies to an ever-expanding amount of rice, so the number of grains added with each doubling goes up, even though the rate of growth is constant.
At a 3 percent growth rate, its doubling time — or the number of years to double in size — is 23 years. The growth rate of 1. Because of the large and increasing population size, the number of people added to the global population will riain high for several decades, even as growth rates continue to decline. Between and , most of this annual growth will occur in the less developed countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America whose population growth rates are much higher than those in more developed countries.
The populations in the less developed regions will most likely continue to command a larger proportion of the world total. The more developed countries in Europe and North America, as well as Japan, Australia, and New Zealand, are growing by less than 1 percent annually.
Population growth rates are negative in many European countries, including Russia If the growth rates in these countries continue to fall below zero, population size would slowly decline. The number of years required for the population of an area to double its present size, given the current rate of population growth. Population doubling time is useful to demonstrate the long-term effect of a growth rate, but should not be used to project population size.
Many more-developed countries have very low growth rates. But these countries are not expected to ever double again. Most, in fact, likely have population declines in their future. Many less-developed countries have high growth rates that are associated with short doubling times, but are expected to grow more slowly as birth rates are expected to continue to decline. This is a complex issue.
Rapid population growth in less developed countries is linked to many problems—including poverty, hunger, high infant mortality, and inadequacies in social services, health services, and infrastructure transportation, communication, etc.
It would be a gross oversimplification to say that population growth causes these problems. Population growth could just as easily have been the effect of economic insecurity and poor health care. However, rapid population growth may defeat efforts to combat poverty and hunger and to improve services, as increasing numbers of people put serious pressures on the economy and society of poor nations.
Poverty, for example, existed long before the recent period of rapid population growth. An assessment of poverty must consider the amount and type of natural resources, including minerals and geographic features that a country possesses or lacks. In areas where power and wealth are concentrated in the hands of a few, it is difficult for the poor to break out of the cycle of poverty that is often passed from generation to generation.
Rapid population growth makes this effort even more difficult. Hunger has always been a companion to poverty. However, rapid population growth may intensify the hunger problem; in the most rapidly growing countries, population growth can reduce or eliminate food production gains resulting from modernization of farming.
Population pressures may also encourage practices such as overirrigation and overuse of croplands, which undermine the capacity to feed larger numbers. In some cases, population growth is quite directly related to a social problem because it increases the absolute numbers whose needs must be met. For example, some less developed countries have made enormous progress in increasing the percentage of children enrolled in school.
However, because of population growth during the same period, the number of children who are not enrolled in school also increased because there were insufficient resources to meet the growing need. Similar observations could be made about jobs, housing, sanitation, and other human needs. These problems are compounded when large numbers migrate from rural to urban areas and increase the burden placed on already inadequate supplies and services. A listing of country definitions is published annually in the United Nations Demographic Yearbook.
Through most of history, the human population has lived a rural lifestyle, dependent on agriculture and hunting for survival.
Tags: ageing population dependency ratio employment data employment statistics working population. Esther joined. Esther produces the top-down model for. This involves synthesising overseas, interstate and regional migration patterns to quantify regional change.
Esther loves the way statistics assist in understanding our communities and can dispell urban myths or stereotypes. City of Yarra Vic — Your calculation was correct but the statement of half the population It represents A more accurate statement would be roughly one third of the population is supported by two-thirds of the population.
The higher the dependency ratio the lower the standard of living. If the trend is continued, a lot of pressure is exalted on the able bodied making them less able. Their carrying capacity dwindles as the rate of manufacturing children increases added to higher life expectancy for the old dependents.
How do the dependency ratios of less developed countries compare with those of the developed world? There is also a static version of this chart available. You will see that the dependency ratio of Tanzania and similar less developed countries such as Malawi are very high in comparison to developed countries such as the UK indicating that their economies have got to support a significant dependent population in terms of health care and educational provision.
Further details on the trends in the age dependency ratio in Tanzania can be found on the trading economics site. You can read these in the web window below, or follow the previous link to open the article in a new web window. Development economics.
0コメント