If the crests of one of the waves coincide with the crests of the other, the amplitudes are additive. If the amplitudes of both waves are equal, the resultant amplitude would be doubled. Bear in mind that light intensity varies directly as the square of the amplitude.
Thus, if the amplitude is doubled, intensity is quadrupled. Such additive interference is called constructive interference illustrated in Figure 2. If the crests of one wave coincide with the troughs of the other wave, the resulting amplitude is decreased or may even be completely canceled, as illustrated in Figure 3. This is called destructive interference. The result is a drop in intensity, or in the case of total cancellation, blackness. Thomas Young was an early 19th century physicist who demonstrated interference by showing that light is a wave phenomenon, and he also postulated that different colors of light were made from waves with different lengths.
This was contrary to common opinion at the time, which was widely biased toward the theory that light is a stream of particles. In , Young conducted an experiment providing important evidence that visible light has wave-like properties. This classic experiment, often termed "the Double-Slit experiment," originally used sunlight that had first been diffracted through a single slit as a light source, but we will describe the experiment using coherent red laser light.
The basic setup of the double-slit experiment is illustrated in Figure 4. Coherent laser light is allowed to illuminate a barrier containing two pinhole apertures that allow only some of the light to pass through.
A screen is placed in the region behind the slits, and a pattern of bright red and dark interference bands becomes visible on the screen. The key to this experiment is the mutual coherence between the light diffracted from the two slits at the barrier. Young achieved this coherence through the diffraction of sunlight from the first slit, and we are using a coherent laser source for the purposes of this discussion.
As laser light is diffracted through the two barrier slits, each diffracted wave meets the other in a series of steps, as illustrated in Figure 4 and graphically in the interactive tutorial described above.
Sometimes the waves meet in step or in phase; constructive interference , sometimes they meet out of step or out of phase; destructive interference , and sometimes they meet partially in step.
When the waves meet in step, they add together owing to constructive interference, and a bright area is displayed on the screen. In areas where the waves meet totally out of step, they will subtract from each other towing to destructive interference, and a dark area will appear in that portion of the screen. The resulting patterns on the screen, a product of interference between the two diffracted beams of laser light, are often referred to as interference fringes.
Constructive and Destructive interference. Young's double slit introduction. Young's double slit equation. Young's double slit problem solving. Single slit interference.
More on single slit interference. Thin Film Interference part 1. Thin Film Interference part 2. Current timeTotal duration Google Classroom Facebook Twitter. Video transcript - [Instructor] So imagine you've got a wave source. This could be a little oscillator that's creating a wave on a string, or a little paddle that goes up and down that creates waves on water, or a speaker that creates sound waves.
This could be any wave source whatsoever creates this wave, a nice simple harmonic wave. Now let's say you've got a second wave source. If we take this wave source, the second one, and we put it basically right on top of the first one, we're gonna get wave interference because wave interference happens when two waves overlap.
And if we want to know what the total wave's gonna look like we add up the contributions from each wave. So if I put a little backdrop in here and I add the contributions, if the equilibrium point is right here, so that's where the wave would be zero, the total wave can be found by adding up the contributions from each wave.
So if we add up the contributions from wave one and wave two wave one here has a value of one unit, wave two has a value of one unit. One unit plus one unit is two units.
And then zero units and zero units is still zero. Negative one and negative one is negative two, and you keep doing this and you realize wait, you're just gonna get a really big cosine looking wave. I'm just gonna drop down to here. We say that these waves are constructively interfering. We call this constructive interference because the two waves combined to construct a wave that was twice as big as the original wave.
So when two waves combine and form a wave bigger than they were before, we call it constructive interference. And because these two waves combined perfectly, sometimes you'll hear this as perfectly constructive or totally constructive interference.
You could imagine cases where they don't line up exactly correct, but you still might get a bigger wave. In that case, it's still constructive. It might not be totally constructive. So that was constructive interference. And these waves were constructive?
Think about it because this wave source two looked exactly like wave source one did, and we just overlapped them and we got double the wave, which is kinda like alright, duh.
That's not that impressive. But check this out. Let's say you had another wave source. A different wave source two. This one is what we call Pi shifted 'cause look at it. Instead of starting at a maximum, this one starts at a minimum compared to what wave source one is at. That's why people often call this Pi shifted, or degrees shifted. So what happens if we overlap these two? Now I'm gonna take these two. Let's get rid of that there, let's just overlap these two and see what happens.
I'm gonna overlap these two waves. We'll perform the same analysis. I don't even really need the backdrop now because look at. In this case, the destructive nature of the interference does not lead to complete cancellation. Interestingly, the meeting of two waves along a medium does not alter the individual waves or even deviate them from their path. This only becomes an astounding behavior when it is compared to what happens when two billiard balls meet or two football players meet.
Billiard balls might crash and bounce off each other and football players might crash and come to a stop. Yet two waves will meet, produce a net resulting shape of the medium, and then continue on doing what they were doing before the interference. The task of determining the shape of the resultant demands that the principle of superposition is applied.
The principle of superposition is sometimes stated as follows:. When two waves interfere, the resulting displacement of the medium at any location is the algebraic sum of the displacements of the individual waves at that same location. In the cases above, the summing the individual displacements for locations of complete overlap was made out to be an easy task - as easy as simple arithmetic:.
In actuality, the task of determining the complete shape of the entire medium during interference demands that the principle of superposition be applied for every point or nearly every point along the medium.
As an example of the complexity of this task, consider the two interfering waves at the right. A snapshot of the shape of each individual wave at a particular instant in time is shown.
To determine the precise shape of the medium at this given instant in time, the principle of superposition must be applied to several locations along the medium.
A short cut involves measuring the displacement from equilibrium at a few strategic locations. Thus, approximately 20 locations have been picked and labeled as A, B, C, D, etc. The actual displacement of each individual wave can be counted by measuring from the equilibrium position up to the particular wave.
At position A, there is no displacement for either individual wave; thus, the resulting displacement of the medium at position will be 0 units. At position B, the smaller wave has a displacement of approximately 1.
In the dull areas, the interference is probably mostly destructive. In the louder areas, the interference is probably mostly constructive. Make waves with a dripping faucet, audio speaker, or laser! Add a second source or a pair of slits to create an interference pattern. Skip to main content. Oscillatory Motion and Waves. Search for:. Superposition and Interference Learning Objectives By the end of this section, you will be able to: Explain standing waves. Describe the mathematical representation of overtones and beat frequency.
Figure 7. First and second harmonic frequencies are shown. Making Career Connections Piano tuners use beats routinely in their work. Check Your Understanding Part 1 Imagine you are holding one end of a jump rope, and your friend holds the other.
Solution The rope would alternate between having waves with amplitudes two times the original amplitude and reaching equilibrium with no amplitude at all. The wavelengths will result in both constructive and destructive interference Part 2 Define nodes and antinodes. Solution Nodes are areas of wave interference where there is no motion. Part 3 You hook up a stereo system. Solution With multiple speakers putting out sounds into the room, and these sounds bouncing off walls, there is bound to be some wave interference.
Click to download the simulation. Run using Java. Conceptual Questions Speakers in stereo systems have two color-coded terminals to indicate how to hook up the wires. If the wires are reversed, the speaker moves in a direction opposite that of a properly connected speaker. Explain why it is important to have both speakers connected the same way.
What beat frequency do they produce? The middle-C hammer of a piano hits two strings, producing beats of 1. One of the strings is tuned to What frequencies could the other string have? Two tuning forks having frequencies of and Hz are struck simultaneously. What average frequency will you hear, and what will the beat frequency be? Twin jet engines on an airplane are producing an average sound frequency of Hz with a beat frequency of 0. What are their individual frequencies?
At what frequency must the Slinky be oscillating? Three adjacent keys on a piano F, F-sharp, and G are struck simultaneously, producing frequencies of , , and Hz. What beat frequencies are produced by this discordant combination? Licenses and Attributions.
0コメント